Become a Fan!
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who's Online
14 user(s) are online (11 user(s) are browsing Forums)

C2C3C4, TommyT-Bone, Matatk, more...
How Many Gurus Are There?
As of Sun, July 11, 2010:
2330 Registered Gurus
Guru Dictionary
Print in friendly format Send this term to a friend  Horn
A rather boring honk, but it should be loud and clear.

It should work with key on or off....
Supporting Vendors
Gold
FIC
Registered Vendors
Guru Friends
Supporting Banners

TIRERACK.com - Revolutionizing Tire Buying


Great deals on auto restoration supplies!


Shop for Winter Tires Now!


Click to go to KustomShop now





Click to go to the Restoration Shop now

Support This Site
 Register To Post

Weavsvet MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


I'm looking at a recent data log of mine and still wondering why my MAF rate is still low.

This is a screen shot of a log I did today. Notice the max rpm is 6326. The air flow actually hit it's highest point at 5863 rpm.

What if anything does this tell me? Aren't these g/s rates still low for my mods? Shouldn't they be more in the 320-340 g/s range?

My tuner may wants to try using speed density just to see what if anything changes with the motor. Thoughts on this?

Photobucket
Posted on: 7/29 14:42
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

bogus Re: MAF g/s again........
Webmaster
Torrance, CA
10964 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/6 17:00


It sounds to me like the cam is falling off...

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the 96 have a MAP and MAF? I thought that the computer swapped sensors at WOT??? Am I totally smoking crack?
Posted on: 7/30 10:35
_________________
The only time cheating is acceptable is when death is involved.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


Quote:

bogus wrote:
It sounds to me like the cam is falling off...

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the 96 have a MAP and MAF? I thought that the computer swapped sensors at WOT??? Am I totally smoking crack?


Yep, both MAP and MAF. Does it switch to MAP at WOT or the other way around?
Posted on: 7/30 11:02
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


Quote:

bogus wrote:
It sounds to me like the cam is falling off...

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the 96 have a MAP and MAF? I thought that the computer swapped sensors at WOT??? Am I totally smoking crack?


Ya know, I've never been happy with this cam! The car hasn't been right since I installed it. I even went to get a dyno tune not long after I installed it. The tuner there said he couldn't do anything with it because one side of the motor was acting different than the other side and he did not know why. It appears that is still happening. Maybe the grind is just totally wrong on it.
Posted on: 7/30 11:10
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Steve40th Re: MAF g/s again........
Guru
617 Posts
Member since:
2005/12/19 16:00


Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Quote:

bogus wrote:
It sounds to me like the cam is falling off...

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the 96 have a MAP and MAF? I thought that the computer swapped sensors at WOT??? Am I totally smoking crack?


Ya know, I've never been happy with this cam! The car hasn't been right since I installed it. I even went to get a dyno tune not long after I installed it. The tuner there said he couldn't do anything with it because one side of the motor was acting different than the other side and he did not know why. It appears that is still happening. Maybe the grind is just totally wrong on it.

I know this is a little off topic here, but I still think your valve springs are too stiff.
This camshaft would be happier with Beehives 918's. I had stiff springs on an engine, and when i switched to beehives it was a different engine. revved easier etc.
Posted on: 7/30 12:44
_________________
Ko'u ohana aia ku'a ikaika
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


Quote:

Steve40th wrote:
Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Quote:

bogus wrote:
It sounds to me like the cam is falling off...

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the 96 have a MAP and MAF? I thought that the computer swapped sensors at WOT??? Am I totally smoking crack?


Ya know, I've never been happy with this cam! The car hasn't been right since I installed it. I even went to get a dyno tune not long after I installed it. The tuner there said he couldn't do anything with it because one side of the motor was acting different than the other side and he did not know why. It appears that is still happening. Maybe the grind is just totally wrong on it.

I know this is a little off topic here, but I still think your valve springs are too stiff.
This camshaft would be happier with Beehives 918's. I had stiff springs on an engine, and when i switched to beehives it was a different engine. revved easier etc.


Maybe it is Steve. IF I do change them though I believe I'd rather have a double spring. Nothing against the Beehives I'd just feel better knowing there were two there instead of one. I'd probably just go with the AFR-8017 like I should have to begin with.
Posted on: 7/30 13:04
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Steve40th Re: MAF g/s again........
Guru
617 Posts
Member since:
2005/12/19 16:00


Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Quote:

Steve40th wrote:
Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Quote:

bogus wrote:
It sounds to me like the cam is falling off...

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the 96 have a MAP and MAF? I thought that the computer swapped sensors at WOT??? Am I totally smoking crack?


Ya know, I've never been happy with this cam! The car hasn't been right since I installed it. I even went to get a dyno tune not long after I installed it. The tuner there said he couldn't do anything with it because one side of the motor was acting different than the other side and he did not know why. It appears that is still happening. Maybe the grind is just totally wrong on it.

I know this is a little off topic here, but I still think your valve springs are too stiff.
This camshaft would be happier with Beehives 918's. I had stiff springs on an engine, and when i switched to beehives it was a different engine. revved easier etc.


Maybe it is Steve. IF I do change them though I believe I'd rather have a double spring. Nothing against the Beehives I'd just feel better knowing there were two there instead of one. I'd probably just go with the AFR-8017 like I should have to begin with.

I am with you on having a extra spring for safety. But Beehives are used as factory equipement on many engines, including all LS engines.
Posted on: 7/30 13:22
_________________
Ko'u ohana aia ku'a ikaika
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

LT4BUD Re: MAF g/s again........
Guru Newb
49 Posts
Member since:
2008/2/11 16:00


Quote:

I am with you on having a extra spring for safety. But Beehives are used as factory equipement on many engines, including all LS engines.


Two springs equals twice as many things to break!!!

FWIW I used beehives and my engine revs to my limiter of 6800 no problem...IMHO beehives represent state of the art in valve train technology and to the best of knowledge have proven to be highly reliable

..but back to your concerns, looks like your MAP is at 99.8 at 5863 rpm......just curious do you have a MAP logged from this same run at a lower rpm??? ..going way back to your not enough air posts, which I am not sue if you ever resolved or not..
Posted on: 7/30 17:27
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


Quote:

LT4BUD wrote:
Quote:

I am with you on having a extra spring for safety. But Beehives are used as factory equipement on many engines, including all LS engines.


Two springs equals twice as many things to break!!!

FWIW I used beehives and my engine revs to my limiter of 6800 no problem...IMHO beehives represent state of the art in valve train technology and to the best of knowledge have proven to be highly reliable

..but back to your concerns, looks like your MAP is at 99.8 at 5863 rpm......just curious do you have a MAP logged from this same run at a lower rpm??? ..going way back to your not enough air posts, which I am not sue if you ever resolved or not..


I got the g/s up to 320 something so that seemed to satisfy my tuner.

Here's another screen shot at about 2800 rpm. Same log.

Attach file:



jpg  2800 rpm screen shot.jpg (61.16 KB)
1726_4c537bb95ee99.jpg 960X720 px
Posted on: 7/30 18:26
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Steve40th Re: MAF g/s again........
Guru
617 Posts
Member since:
2005/12/19 16:00


Have you checked out your MAP sensor? is the little orange gasket good? etc?
Posted on: 7/30 19:11
_________________
Ko'u ohana aia ku'a ikaika
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


Quote:

Steve40th wrote:
Have you checked out your MAP sensor? is the little orange gasket good? etc?


I tried two different ones. No change. The gasket is a little ragged at the very bottom but no cracks and the ribs are good and seems to be tight when inserted in the intake.
Posted on: 7/30 23:55
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


I may have discovered part of my problem. The connector for the MAF sensor either has a loose connection or a bad wire. I can wiggle one wire and it will completely disconnect the sensor. I've ordered a pigtail from EFI Connection.
Posted on: 7/31 8:32
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

LT4BUD Re: MAF g/s again........
Guru Newb
49 Posts
Member since:
2008/2/11 16:00


Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Quote:

Here's another screen shot at about 2800 rpm. Same log.


MAP here doesn't mean much since throttle is not 100% open.

My point is that the barometer is 102.21 and MAP is 99.8 which means you are losing 102.2-99.8=2.4 in the intake system...I do not how this compares to the norm, but I feel it represents at least a measureable loss of potential power.....if your dyno guy could tell you the correction factors for 102.2 vs 99.8, all else being the same, you would have an idea of how much power we are talking about...wish I knew, would certainly like to know..

Hope your bad wire/connector solves your problem

Good luck!!!
Posted on: 7/31 15:07
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: MAF g/s again........
Senior Guru
392 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 2:08


Quote:

LT4BUD wrote:
Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Quote:

Here's another screen shot at about 2800 rpm. Same log.


MAP here doesn't mean much since throttle is not 100% open.

My point is that the barometer is 102.21 and MAP is 99.8 which means you are losing 102.2-99.8=2.4 in the intake system...I do not how this compares to the norm, but I feel it represents at least a measureable loss of potential power.....if your dyno guy could tell you the correction factors for 102.2 vs 99.8, all else being the same, you would have an idea of how much power we are talking about...wish I knew, would certainly like to know..

Hope your bad wire/connector solves your problem

Good luck!!!


I hope it does to because I have no clue where else to look. I also ordered a new Delphi MAP sensor so maybe between the two it's one of them.

I made another screen shot. It had just hit 100% throttle here.

Attach file:



jpg  SAE WOT LOG.jpg (68.87 KB)
1726_4c54b34d670b7.jpg 960X720 px
Posted on: 7/31 16:36
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,SW LT headers, LE 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.6 rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by LT1 PCM Tuning, Solomon Kostelni...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


[Advanced Search]


© 2008-2010 Corvette-Guru.com
Corvette-Guru.com is independently owned and operated, and is not associated with or financially supported by General Motors.

© 2008-2010 Corvette-Guru.com
Corvette-Guru.com is a Guru Garage Site

If you have any questions about our site, please contact us at corvetteguru@gmail.com
Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2008 The XOOPS Project. Hosted by BeanTown Host.